I dislike that mentality.
The fact is, it's not a bug-fix, it's just papering over the real problem.
And by papering it over, it then just makes people less likely to bother
with the real issue.
For example, and I talked about this earlier - what make syou think that
the FUSE/NFSD behaviour you don't like is at all valid in the first place?
If you depend on data not being truncated because you have it "in flight",
tjhere's already something wrong there. It's _not_ just that people can
see zero bytes in the reply - apparently they can see the file shrink
before they see the read return. That kind of thing just worries me. And
it might be a general NFS issue, not necessarily a FUSE one.
So I think your whole approach stinks. I don't agree with the "bug-fix".
It really smells like a "bug-paper-over".
Linus
--
