Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 1:07 pm

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:30:10 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:


The weak link in all of this still might be the need to reserve
hugepages and the unreliability of dynamically allocating them.

The dynamic allocation should be better nowadays, but I've lost track
of how reliable it really is.  What's our status there?

Thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Eric Munson, (Mon Jul 28, 12:17 pm)
[PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks, Eric Munson, (Mon Jul 28, 12:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks, Dave Hansen, (Mon Jul 28, 1:37 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 30, 12:40 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Andrew Morton, (Wed Jul 30, 1:07 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Michael Ellerman, (Thu Jul 31, 7:32 am)