On (30/07/08 01:43), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
quoted text
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:17:10 -0700 Eric Munson <ebmunson@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Certain workloads benefit if their data or text segments are backed by
> > huge pages.
> 
> oh.  As this is a performance patch, it would be much better if its
> description contained some performance measurement results!  Please.
> 

I ran these patches through STREAM (http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/).
STREAM itself was patched to allocate data from the stack instead of statically
for the test. They completed without any problem on x86, x86_64 and PPC64
and each test showed a performance gain from using hugepages.  I can post
the raw figures but they are not currently in an eye-friendly format. Here
are some plots of the data though;

x86: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/stack-backing-20080730/x86-stream-stack.ps
x86_64: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/stack-backing-20080730/x86_64-stream-stack.ps
ppc64-small: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/stack-backing-20080730/ppc64-small-stream-stack.ps
ppc64-large: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/stack-backing-20080730/ppc64-large-stream-stack.ps

The test was to run STREAM with different array sizes (plotted on X-axis)
and measure the average throughput (y-axis). In each case, backing the stack
with large pages with a performance gain.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/