On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27:32PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:05:15PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>> >
>> > Currently source files in the Documentation/ sub-dir can easily bit-rot
>> > since they are not generally buildable, either because they are hidden
>> > in text files or because there are no Makefile rules for them.
>> > This needs to be fixed so that the source files remain usable and good
>> > examples of code instead of bad examples.
>> >
>> > Add the ability to build source files that are in the Documentation/ dir.
>> > Add to Kconfig as "BUILD_DOCSRC" config symbol.
>> >
>> > Use "CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC=1 make ..." to build objects from the
>> > Documentation/ sources.  Or enable BUILD_DOCSRC in the *config system.
>>
>> How about simply adding another makefile target instead? This is more
>> intuitive, imho, and complies with the Kbuild conventions so far.
>> Something like:
>>
>> make docsrc
>>
>> similar to 'make help' or 'make pdfdocs' etc.
>
> With the current approach we have much better build coverage.
> All "allyesconfig" and "allmodconfig" builds will do the test
> builds which is a good think.
> If we introduce "make docsrc" then almost only Randy will do the
> test builds and report the breakage - which is not good.

Well, i don't see anymore people than Randy doing

CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC=1 make ...

either so only the other option remains, which means CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC
should be "default y" for more coverage...


-- 
Regards/Gruß,
Boris
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/