[spender's asked to be off the CC] On 3 Jul 2008 at 11:57, Greg KH wrote:not only this one, but every commit for the past few years that fixed bugs with security impact. for reference: http://lwn.net/Articles/285438/ http://lwn.net/Articles/286263/ http://lwn.net/Articles/287339/ http://lwn.net/Articles/288473/ what is the disclosure policy used for commits fixing bugs with security impact (both vanilla and -stable, especially if there's a difference)? what do you include/omit? how does it relate to what is declared in Documentation/SecurityBugs? --
| Jeff Garzik | [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Dave Young | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Dan Miner | Compilation speeds (was Re: No patchlevel 3.} |
| Ian Jackson | RFD: comp.os.linux split |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
