On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 09:38 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:I received no comment on any part of the changes within tg3.c; only whining about the default behaviour -- which isn't even _set_ as part of the patch in question, any more. After feedback from a number of people, there is no individual Kconfig option for the various firmwares; there is only one which controls them all -- CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL. The thing you're whining about isn't even part of the patch which needs review. I strongly disagree that CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y should be the default. But if I add this patch elsewhere in the kernel, will you quit your whining and actually review the patch you were asked to review? ... diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig index 339c148..d47482f 100644 --- a/drivers/base/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ config FW_LOADER config FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL bool "Include in-kernel firmware blobs in kernel binary" depends on FW_LOADER + default y help The kernel source tree includes a number of firmware 'blobs' which are used by various drivers. The recommended way to -- dwmw2 --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
