On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:15:06PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:Sorry, no, I wasn't trying to blame you. I understand that this was a hard problem to fix, and it wasn't at all obvious that changes in one part of the networking stack would break wireless stack due to bad assumptions it had made, that had been hiding for quite some time. The timing is just very unfortunate, since if -rc1 had been delayed by just one more day so it could have incorporated it we would probably reduce the large number of regression reports; a lot of people who test -rc1 don't necessarily follow netdev or linux-wireless. I'm of course also nervously building -rc1 and about to test it, since I haven't had a chance to test anything since -git6, and I'm wondering if some other regression may have been introduced since then. Since it probably doesn't get said enough to everyone who works of fixing bugs/regressions, thanks very much for your efforts; I (and many other people) very much appreciate it!! - Ted --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Geert Uytterhoeven | Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
