Re: [PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Monday, July 28, 2008 - 1:37 pm

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:17 -0700, Eric Munson wrote:

Why do you have the #ifdef for the CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP=y case in that
first patch if you don't support CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP=y?

I think it might be worth some time to break this up a wee little bit.
16 local variables is a big on the beefy side. :)

-- Dave

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Eric Munson, (Mon Jul 28, 12:17 pm)
[PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks, Eric Munson, (Mon Jul 28, 12:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5 V2] Build hugetlb backed process stacks, Dave Hansen, (Mon Jul 28, 1:37 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 30, 12:40 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5 V2] Huge page backed user-space stacks, Michael Ellerman, (Thu Jul 31, 7:32 am)