> Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz> writes:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>> Geert Uytterhoeven has a patch in his POSTPONED queue that is supposed
> >>>> to fix Atari FAT. I can't speak to whether it works or why it's
> >>>> postponed, but it seems to compile.
> >>> I see. Although I don't know the patch, I'd like to add this part to
> >>> Geert's patch if possible. And when the patch can be posted, we can
> >>> re-add this part again.
> >>>
> >>> Geert, what do you think?
> >>
> >> It's in POSTPONED state because nobody speaks up for/against it.
> >> Personally, I don't know how much it is (still) needed...
> >> But a few years ago somebody contacted me that he used it succesfully
> >> on PA-RISC and i386 ;-)
> >>
> >> BTW, the patch is
> >>
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/POSTPONED/134-atari-fat.diff
> >>
> >> Atari people, I think now is the time to let it live or die...
> >
> > The patch looks good, how can I let it live?
>
> Could you test whether it works well? If it works fine, I'll merge and
> clean it up. If it doesn't work, please fix it.