* Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> [Thu, 24 Jul 2008]:
quoted text
>>> Anyway, I'll send the patch to this person so he can try it. I guess it 
>>> won't fix his problem. This patch is much simpler and doesn't need any 
>>> delays - I really think this is a different situation.
>>
>> It isn't.  And your patch is an ad-hoc correction that doesn't address
>> the true underlying reasons for the errors.
>
> Tomas, you should try the patch listed in that bug report (well, except 
> maybe the part that's actually adding the JMicron unusual devices entry) 
> and see if that fixes the problem.

I'll try that patch next week - but I have no confidence in the
reliability of fixing the problem by inserting random delays. All
I have wanted to achieve is to detect the errors and thus prevent
the silent data corruption. 

I don't really mind those sporadic forced resets since they cause
no data corruption, at least in my setup. My simple patch
accomplishes the goal of preventing data corruption more reliably,
I think.


-- 
Tomas Styblo <tripie@cpan.org>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/