On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:47:19PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
quoted text
>
> Let's try this again: did you know that ksize could fail depending on
> kernel configuration? Most of us would answer no. That suggests the API
> is bad. This ranks 12 on Rusty's spectrum of user-friendly APIs:

I think you misunderstood my argument.  I never suggested changing
the existing ksize interface to return an error onto unsuspecting
users.  I suggested creating a new interface that is explicitly
designed to return an error if the underlying implementation
is unable to support this.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/