how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Robert P. J. Day
Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008 - 8:14 am

how about a concerted effort to remove inappropriate EXPERIMENTAL
dependencies from the Kconfig files?  there must be a truckload of
stuff that has long since matured beyond EXPERIMENTAL status that is
still tagged that way.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Robert P. J. Day, (Thu Jul 24, 8:14 am)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Robert P. J. Day, (Thu Jul 24, 1:06 pm)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Roland Dreier, (Thu Jul 24, 1:09 pm)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Robert P. J. Day, (Thu Jul 24, 1:10 pm)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Chris Friesen, (Thu Jul 24, 10:15 pm)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Fri Jul 25, 3:41 am)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Robert P. J. Day, (Fri Jul 25, 5:08 am)
Re: how much stuff is no longer "EXPERIMENTAL"?, Stefan Richter, (Fri Jul 25, 5:51 am)