On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:11:49AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
quoted text >
> You don't honestly expect people to correctly code to such a standard,
> do you? People will assume that ksize never fails, they will be wrong,
> and computers will die.
If we follow this argument then most of our interfaces would be
broken.
quoted text > > You're taking
> > away an entire interface just because an underlying implementation
> > that's used by a very small proportion of users doesn't do the
> > right thing.
>
> Umm, no. There were very few users to being with, so it was actually a
> fairly large proportion. And that suggested the interface was a bad
> idea.
Huh? I'm talking about users of the kernel. A very small proportion
of those use SLOB.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at
http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key:
http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel ... , Herbert Xu , (Thu Jul 24, 10:37 am)