Pekka Enberg wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Dieter Ries <clip2@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I think I managed to catch one of those:
>>
>> general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP
>> CPU 0
>> Modules linked in:
>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.26-06373-gcaf076e #49
>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff805e08f9>]  [<ffffffff805e08f9>]
>> nf_nat_move_storage+0x21/0x7a
>> ...
>> Call Trace:
>>  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8059d3c4>] __nf_ct_ext_add+0x15f/0x1f7
>>  [<ffffffff805e762c>] nf_nat_fn+0x84/0x152
>>  [<ffffffff805e77d8>] nf_nat_in+0x2f/0x71
> Dieter, can you please try this patch:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/24/186
> 
> Patrick, it looks like this could be the same bug Ingo is hitting?

Yes, that most likely the same underlying problem.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/