From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
hpfs_unlink() calls notify_change() to truncate the file before
deleting. Replace with explicit call to hpfs_notify_change().
This is equivalent, except that:
- security_inode_setattr() is not called before hpfs_notify_change()
- fsnotify_change() is not called after hpfs_notify_change()
The truncation is just an implementation detail, so both the security
check and the notification are unnecessary.
Possibly even the ctime modification is wrong?
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
CC: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
---
fs/hpfs/namei.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/hpfs/namei.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/hpfs/namei.c 2008-07-23 00:10:13.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/hpfs/namei.c 2008-07-23 00:10:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ again:
/*printk("HPFS: truncating file before delete.\n");*/
newattrs.ia_size = 0;
newattrs.ia_valid = ATTR_SIZE | ATTR_CTIME;
- err = notify_change(dentry, &newattrs);
+ newattrs.ia_ctime = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb);
+ err = hpfs_notify_change(dentry, &newattrs);
put_write_access(inode);
if (!err)
goto again;
--
--
| Theodore Tso | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I |
git: | |
| Wenji Wu | RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
