Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...>
Cc: <aj@...>, Fabian Kreutz <kreutz@...>, Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, July 21, 2008 - 6:55 am

On Monday 2008-07-21 12:26, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

IMHO it looks easier (when directly editing the nroff file)
if you write it inline

	functions decalred in \fI<math.h>\fP return a NaN.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Fwd: math_error.7 draft 3, for review, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Jul 21, 6:14 am)
Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Jul 21, 6:26 am)
Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review, Andreas Jaeger, (Fri Jul 25, 5:41 am)
Re: math_error.7 draft 3, for review, Jan Engelhardt, (Mon Jul 21, 6:55 am)