David Lang wrote:Nobody is saying you should package the exploit. If they need someone else to package it, they'll still need that. So the question is not if this will deter script kiddies but whether it will deter the people who package exploits for them. And from experience, I can tell you that answer is no. Manys attacks that were believed too difficult for the script kiddies to do were packaged by people who had the expertise and then used by script kiddies. The alternative is that the fix gets released but not implemented. I can tell you how many run exploits against their production systems when they don't know the exploits exist -- zero. It takes, at a minimum, the knowledge that an exploit is possible. In the cases being discussed, even this was withheld. Fixes will not be widely deployed on a timely basis unless, at an absolute minimum, it is known that there is an exploitable bug that has been fixed. DS --
| Stephen Smalley | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
git: | |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] myr10ge: again fix lro_gen_skb() alignment |
