Hi -

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:12:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
quoted text
> [...]
> > Can you explain in detail how you believe this is materially
> > different from offsetting from _stext?
> 
> Basically because _stext is an incredibly dangerous symbol; being linker
> generated it doesn't actually get put in the right place if you look:

Thank you for your response.

quoted text
> jejb@sparkweed> nm vmlinux |egrep -w '_stext|_text'
> ffffffff80209000 T _stext
> ffffffff80200000 A _text
> 
> Since we can't do negative offsets

Actually, "we" as in systemtap could do it just fine if that were
desired.  And really _stext is therefore an arbitrary choice - it
could be any other reference.

My point is that the proposed effort to identify a nearby function
symbol to use as a base for each probe's symbol+offset calculation is
wasted.


quoted text
> you've lost access to the symbols in the sections that start before _stext.  

What's between _text and _stext appears to consist of kernel boot-time
functions that are unmapped the time anything like systemtap could
run.


quoted text
> Assuming you meant _text (which is dangerous because it's a define
> in the kernel linker script and could change).

By "dangerous" do you only mean that it may require a one-liner
catch-up patch in systemtap if the kernel linker scripts change?


quoted text
> Then you can't offset into other sections, like init sections or
> modules.

Kernel init sections are unprobeable by definition, so that doesn't
matter.  Modules are also irrelevant, since their addresses are
relative to their relocation bases / sections, not to a kernel
(vmlinux) symbol.


- FChE
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/