Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a check for task_child_reaper

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel Hokka Zakrisson <daniel@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <containers@...>, <oleg@...>, <xemul@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 - 2:51 pm

"Daniel Hokka Zakrisson" <daniel@hozac.com> writes:


Sorry that was a half truth.  Outside of the context of pid namespaces it is true.

In the context of pid namespaces it is false because we haven't merged the patches
to drop signals from inside the pid namespace on the way to init.

So it is a check that _should_ be redundant.

Eric
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p-&gt;pid == 1 check with a che..., Daniel Hokka Zakrisson, (Thu Jul 17, 10:56 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p-&gt;pid == 1 check with a..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jul 17, 1:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p-&gt;pid == 1 check with a..., Daniel Hokka Zakrisson, (Thu Jul 17, 2:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: replace p->pid == 1 check with a..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jul 17, 2:51 pm)