.. I really dislike how this was done.
This commit:
11c3b79218390a139f2d474ee1e983a672d5839a ("configfs: Allow ->make_item()
and ->make_group() to return detailed errors.")
is just ugly. Returning one value by passing a pointer to a pointer, and
the error value by returning an 'int' errno is _not_ how we do things in
the kernel.
No, we use error pointers.
IOW, you should have left the calling convention for "(*make_item)()" and
"(*make_group)()" alone, but allowed people to just do
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
etc for errors, and then in the caller you just check for IS_ERR().
That would have made the result much cleaner, and avoided that whole
"return two different things" issue.
I pulled it, but I want to register my protest.
Linus
--