On 07/17, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
quoted text
>
> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> > 
> > The way zap_pid_ns_processes does it is worse, since it signals every
> > thread in the namespace rather than every thread group. So either we walk
> 
> It's questionable whether there are more "threads in a pid namespace" than
> "processes in a system".
> 
> E.g. on my notebook there are ~110 processes and ~150 threads. So having 
> this setup launched in 10 containers you'll have to walk 1100 tasks, while
> zap_pid_ns_processes only 150 ;)
> 
> Some real-life example with containers: on one of our servers with 10 
> containers serving as git repo, bulding system and some other stuff there 
> are ~200 process totally and ~20 threads in each container. See?
> 
> I tend to believe that walking threads in a container is cheaper then
> walking processes in a system...

kill_something_info() can't walk threads, think about the realtime signals.

Anyway, I think we should change kill_something_info(-1) to use rcu_read_lock()
instead of tasklist.

Oleg.

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/