Re: [PATCH] prng; bring prng into better alignment with specification

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Neil Horman
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 - 4:04 am

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:48:56PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Yeah, I was trying to decide if I should remove that or not, in the event we
wanted to support alternate [blk]ciphers in the future for the cprng.  As I
think about it, I don't think its a big deal to nix.  I'll get rid of it
shortly.

Thanks
Neil


-- 
/***************************************************
 *Neil Horman
 *nhorman@tuxdriver.com
 *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
 *http://pgp.mit.edu
 ***************************************************/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] prng; bring prng into better alignment with sp ..., Neil Horman, (Thu Jul 17, 4:04 am)