Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alex Chiang
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 5:03 pm

* Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>:

The short answer is that HP-UX decided to keep major number 11 as
a branding decision, and has released updates such as 11i, 11i v1,
11i v2, etc.

Most recent release was 11i v3, and if you do a uname -a, you'll
see that you get a "real" version, like 11.31.

	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hpux#Versions

/ac

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Mon Jul 14, 7:10 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 14, 7:22 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Mon Jul 14, 7:31 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 14, 7:47 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, david, (Mon Jul 14, 8:55 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Jul 14, 10:31 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rafael C. de Almeida, (Mon Jul 14, 11:40 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Tue Jul 15, 12:23 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Jul 15, 12:49 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Tue Jul 15, 1:29 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jul 15, 3:10 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Jul 15, 4:31 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alan Cox, (Tue Jul 15, 5:38 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Kasper Sandberg, (Tue Jul 15, 5:41 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alberto Gonzalez, (Tue Jul 15, 6:18 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Byron Stanoszek, (Tue Jul 15, 7:07 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Tue Jul 15, 7:24 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 15, 8:20 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Tobias Brox, (Tue Jul 15, 9:36 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jul 15, 11:04 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Charles grey wolf Banas, (Tue Jul 15, 11:06 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jul 15, 1:43 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Tue Jul 15, 9:22 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rafael C. de Almeida, (Tue Jul 15, 11:55 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:17 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:30 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Jul 16, 12:53 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:57 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Wed Jul 16, 2:34 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Wed Jul 16, 2:11 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Wed Jul 16, 2:14 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alex Chiang, (Wed Jul 16, 5:03 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Thu Jul 17, 5:38 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jul 17, 10:25 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Thu Jul 17, 12:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alex Chiang, (Thu Jul 17, 1:02 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jul 17, 1:21 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jul 17, 3:16 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 1:00 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Sat Jul 19, 1:52 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Sat Jul 19, 12:30 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 1:49 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, david, (Sat Jul 19, 1:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 2:16 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Jul 19, 2:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Sat Jul 19, 4:10 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Sun Jul 20, 1:34 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stefanos Harhalakis, (Sun Jul 20, 7:53 am)