On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:Andi did not. The whole series I pulled was rebased today at 2PM. I was going to complain about it, because Len's trees were always a pleasure to pull with clearly delineated topic branches etc, and pulling from Andi was such a let-down in comparison. But I decided to let it slide, because quite frankly, Len had done better than the average bear, and I didn't realize that the commits Andi had rebased had actually been in Len's tree in the _good_ format. It seems I was wrong - I should _not_ have let it slide, and it appears that Andi had actually destroyed Len's pretty tree. Andi. This can _not_ continue. You need to learn how to use topic branches, and how to not screw up other peoples trees. Otherwise I'll just have to stop pulling from you. AGAIN. Linus --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.20-rc6 |
| Mike Snitzer | Re: Distributed storage. |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Herbert Xu | Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state ch... |
