On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:

quoted text
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:46:46 -0400 (EDT)
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > >> Even if we fix it now, the question is: how long it will stay fixed? Until
> > >> someone makes another change to struct device that restricts boundaries on
> > >> some wacky hardware.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how the boundary restriction of a device can break
> > > the VMERGE accounting.
> > 
> > Because block layer code doesn't know anything about the device, pci 
> > access restrictions and so on.
> 
> Not true, the block layer knows about the device restrictions like DMA
> boundary.
> 
> But it's not the point here because the boundary restriction doesn't
> matter for the VMERGE accounting. An IOMMU just returns an error if it
> can't allocate an I/O space fit for the device restrictions.
> 
> 
> Please give me an example how the boundary restriction of a device can
> break the VMERGE accounting and an IOMMU if you aren't still sure.

You have dma_get_seg_boundary and dma_get_max_seg_size. On sparc64, adding 
one of these broken VMERGE accounting (the VMERGE didn't happen past 64-kb 
boundary and bio layer thought that VMERGE would be possible).

And if you fix this case, someone will break it again, sooner or later, by 
adding new restriction.

Mikulas
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/