Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 10:18 am

* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:


Erm, no. In the merge window i follow upstream -git, not "my tree", and 
i searched lkml for the build failure signature and it had nothing 
there. Then i looked at the commit and it said that it was created just 
1 day before the merge window started:

 commit feac6a07c4a3578bffd6769bb4927e8a7e1f3ffe
 Author:     Martin Petermann <martin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 AuthorDate: Wed Jul 2 10:56:35 2008 +0200
 Commit:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
 CommitDate: Sat Jul 12 08:22:34 2008 -0500
                 ^^^^^^

So i didnt even think of it having hit linux-next so i didnt look into 
the linux-next archives. lkml should have been Cc:-ed in this case, 
that's where people look for in case of upstream breakages. You would 
have saved me some effort via that - please try to do it in the future, 
it's very helpful to testers.

btw., about the technical aspects of the solution, i'm not sure i like 
these big #ifdef blocks:


the clean solution we use everywhere else is to push such #ifdefs into 
the headers, to make them generally includable. For example you can 
include lockdep.h even if you dont have lockdep enabled, you can include 
smp.h even on UP-only files, etc. etc.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, James Bottomley, (Tue Jul 15, 12:15 pm)
[build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 6:16 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 6:33 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 9:15 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, James Bottomley, (Wed Jul 16, 9:52 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 10:54 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 10:18 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed Jul 16, 10:41 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 10:46 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed Jul 16, 10:57 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 10:59 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, James Bottomley, (Wed Jul 16, 10:28 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 16, 10:45 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, James Bottomley, (Wed Jul 16, 11:11 am)
Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1, Matthew Wilcox, (Wed Jul 16, 9:28 am)