Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage of some key caches

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Richard Kennedy <richard@...>
Cc: <penberg@...>, <mpm@...>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>, Mel Gorman <mel@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 10:03 am

Richard Kennedy wrote:


19 objects with an order 1 alloc and 208 byte size? Urgh. 8192/208 = 39 and not 19.

Kmemcheck or something else active? We seem to be loosing 50% of our memory.

Pekka: Is the slabinfo emulation somehow broken?

I'd really like to see the output of slabinfo dentry.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 16, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 16, 9:21 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 16, 10:03 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 18, 10:20 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 18, 10:55 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 18, 1:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Fri Jul 18, 10:17 am)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] slub: increasing order reduces memory usage..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Jul 16, 10:46 am)