i understand what it is, i would understand it even if it said even
less.
what does this have to do with carefully avoiding the word 'security'
on one hand and disclosing it on another? do you understand the word
'consistency' or are you 'stupid beyond hope'?
no you don't see it. you haven't even read or understood all the
discussion else you would not be making stupid claims as below:
are you out of your mind? since when it is the job of users (meaning,
users of commit logs) to reverse engineer what the heck the given
commit was supposed to actually fix? do you think they don't have
better use of their time? if there is a purpose of a commit message
then it's that of informing the reader, not confusing or misleading
him.
what is mindless about applying a security fix?
where did i say that people should apply security fixes without
considering other, unmarked fixes? i said the exact opposite which
you would know if you had actually cared to read the thread in its
entirety.
udv,
PaX Team
--
