Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rene Herman
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 12:30 am

On 16-07-08 08:55, Rafael C. de Almeida wrote:

(and please don't drop CCs on linux-kernel. I for example in this case 
would like the X as user thing to be noticed as I believe it's a nice 
point as an "externally significant" thing)



I don't. I hate bores.

More importantly though, that's really the kind of thing where you can
argue about how life should and/or could be until you're blue in the
face but if it isn't, it doesn't actually matter any. People intimately
involved with a project like Linux (say, subscribers to this list)
definitely look quite different at it than others and that's nothing
bad. Communicating information to these people through shortcuts like
version numbers isn't necesarily anything to avoid.

There ARE features in the pipeline you could plan for that would warrant
a version jump. I'd for example consider being able to run X not as root
a very worthy goal for a version jump (be it 2.8 or 3.0). That's also a
change in the area where those that are NOT intimately involved yet
interested in a more than professional way are -- on the desktop.

Really. I'd like it much better if the big cool feature of the all new
Linux kernel would be running X as user, rather than when the big cool
feature of X running as a user would require a version of Linux newer
than the february 2010 release.

If you get what I mean. Do trust me, you'll have time and opportunity
enough in your lifetime to be boringly professional.

Rene.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Mon Jul 14, 7:10 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 14, 7:22 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Mon Jul 14, 7:31 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 14, 7:47 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, david, (Mon Jul 14, 8:55 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Willy Tarreau, (Mon Jul 14, 10:31 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rafael C. de Almeida, (Mon Jul 14, 11:40 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stoyan Gaydarov, (Tue Jul 15, 12:23 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Jul 15, 12:49 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Tue Jul 15, 1:29 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Andi Kleen, (Tue Jul 15, 3:10 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Jul 15, 4:31 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alan Cox, (Tue Jul 15, 5:38 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Kasper Sandberg, (Tue Jul 15, 5:41 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alberto Gonzalez, (Tue Jul 15, 6:18 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Byron Stanoszek, (Tue Jul 15, 7:07 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Tue Jul 15, 7:24 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 15, 8:20 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Tobias Brox, (Tue Jul 15, 9:36 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jul 15, 11:04 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Charles grey wolf Banas, (Tue Jul 15, 11:06 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Jul 15, 1:43 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Tue Jul 15, 9:22 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rafael C. de Almeida, (Tue Jul 15, 11:55 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:17 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:30 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Jul 16, 12:53 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Wed Jul 16, 12:57 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Wed Jul 16, 2:34 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Wed Jul 16, 2:11 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Wed Jul 16, 2:14 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alex Chiang, (Wed Jul 16, 5:03 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Lennart Sorensen, (Thu Jul 17, 5:38 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jul 17, 10:25 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Thu Jul 17, 12:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Alex Chiang, (Thu Jul 17, 1:02 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Jul 17, 1:21 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jul 17, 3:16 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 1:00 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Sat Jul 19, 1:52 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Sat Jul 19, 12:30 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 1:49 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, david, (Sat Jul 19, 1:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Craig Milo Rogers, (Sat Jul 19, 2:16 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sat Jul 19, 2:56 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Peter T. Breuer, (Sat Jul 19, 4:10 pm)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Rene Herman, (Sun Jul 20, 1:34 am)
Re: From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7?, Stefanos Harhalakis, (Sun Jul 20, 7:53 am)