On 16-07-08 08:55, Rafael C. de Almeida wrote:I don't. I hate bores. More importantly though, that's really the kind of thing where you can argue about how life should and/or could be until you're blue in the face but if it isn't, it doesn't actually matter any. People intimately involved with a project like Linux (say, subscribers to this list) definitely look quite different at it than others and that's nothing bad. Communicating information to these people through shortcuts like version numbers isn't necesarily anything to avoid. There ARE features in the pipeline you could plan for that would warrant a version jump. I'd for example consider being able to run X not as root a very worthy goal for a version jump (be it 2.8 or 3.0). That's also a change in the area where those that are NOT intimately involved yet interested in a more than professional way are -- on the desktop. Really. I'd like it much better if the big cool feature of the all new Linux kernel would be running X as user, rather than when the big cool feature of X running as a user would require a version of Linux newer than the february 2010 release. If you get what I mean. Do trust me, you'll have time and opportunity enough in your lifetime to be boringly professional. Rene. --
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| Andrew Morton | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (paravirt/vsmp/no PCI) |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
