On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 08:43:07PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:Exactly. To give you an idea, I have a lot of servers running on a "firmware" which consists in two parts : - a bzImage containing an initramfs with modules and a few scripts - an initrd which is in fact the rootfs When the kernel boots, it mounts the initrd, does a pivot_root and mounts its modules into /boot/$(uname -r). All my kernels run modules from /boot and not from /lib/modules, because it makes them more convenient to add and remove. So /lib/modules is just a symlink to /boot. The above process is very convenient, as it is compatible with a lot of boot methods : hard disk, CDROM, USB stick, PXE, etc... And moreover, I can have multiple kernels with only one rootfs (SMP, etc). Introducing firmware there would mean a major thinking and rework of the build (and possibly boot) process. The least invasive would probably be to stuff them next to the modules in $(uname -r)/firmware, but even then, it will take a lot of time to switch to a new system. And judging from what I see around, I'm far from being the only one not using mkinitrd. Willy --
| Pierre Ossman | Re: [RFC][PATCH] cpuidle: avoid singing capacitors |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Greg KH | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Rene Herman | 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 |
git: | |
| Jesper Krogh | Re: NIU - Sun Neptune 10g - Transmit timed out reset (2.6.24) |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
