Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more drivers.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>
Cc: Linux-Kernel-Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 8:55 pm

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:


Something from the non-development world:

At least the initramfs-tools (which contains mkinitrd) of Debian Etch do 
not do this (the current testing/development version Lenny does) - no 
firmware support in the initrd at all - and not needed for booting until 
now.
(It has /lib/firmware support after the initrd for the not-so-important
stuff like usb/sound/video/wireless)

Yes, it may be nearly ancient by now, but for servers it contains all we 
need, and most certainly would not want to use something that changes and 
needs checking/hand-fixing every month - I expect this version to be still 
in use a year from now, then just gradually being updated to the next 
debian version.

Currently we use 2.6.24, and I expect to use some newer kernel to support 
newer replacement hardware before all installs are upgraded. So having the 
firmware-inside-module support would be a help for us when modules are 
starting to be needed for disk or network access, keeping from the need to 
try backporting huge initrd/make-kpkg changes.

c'ya
sven

-- 

The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around
it. (John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Prosaic firmware issues, Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Jul 15, 9:11 pm)
Re: Prosaic firmware issues, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jul 15, 9:45 pm)
Re: Prosaic firmware issues, David Woodhouse, (Wed Jul 16, 1:54 am)
Re: Prosaic firmware issues, Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Jul 16, 10:19 am)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Tue Jul 15, 2:05 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Jul 15, 12:04 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Jul 15, 1:05 am)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Jul 15, 1:15 am)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Jul 15, 12:56 am)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied , Oliver Neukum, (Tue Jul 15, 2:23 am)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied , Oliver Neukum, (Tue Jul 15, 12:52 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Sven-Haegar Koch, (Tue Jul 15, 8:55 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Jul 15, 4:45 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Jul 16, 5:28 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Jul 17, 4:42 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Jul 17, 6:25 pm)
Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Jul 15, 7:45 pm)