On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 07:46:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:55:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > > No, I spelled out a list of projects, what would break, and how it would > > > break. > > > > > > Again, > > > > > > * Red Hat driver disks. The build process is unaware of the need to > > > bundle firmware. Any use with Fedora (or, later, RHEL) will result in a > > > non-working driver, for the simple reason that firmware is not copied > > > onto the image. > > > > For old RHEL - they won't support 2.6.27, so moot. > > For next-gen RHEL - they need fixing anyway. > > For Fedora, they don't (and hopefully won't) exist. > > Grin, > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-install-guide-en/fc5/sn-bootoptions-hardware.html I don't think any of this stuff has ever been actually used in a Fedora context. We certainly haven't released any official ones ttbomk. > Or DKMS, which should package firmware: > http://linux.dell.com/projects.shtml Not quite the same thing as a driver disk, but I'll humour you.. That handles MODULE_FIRMWARE fine afaik. Though again, this doesn't see much actual use in a Fedora context. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| Jan Kundrát | kswapd high CPU usage with no swap |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once |
