On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:30:03 -0400 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:It's on linux-kernel. If you don't have a linux-kernel subscription then you should fix that. Set up a procmail rule and do a search-by-subject when needed. In this case, yes, it would have been nice if Jason had cc'ed lots of different lists and individuals on the core patch and then selectively cc'ed lists and individuals on the per-subsystem followup patches. But I doubt if even 2% of patch submitters manage to do all that correctly. --
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
| Christos Zoulas | Re: Melting down your network [Subject changed] |
| Juan RP | Changing the I/O scheduler on-the-fly |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | Re: fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
