Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000000e (reset_prng_context)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...>
Cc: <davem@...>, <mingo@...>, <nhorman@...>, <simon@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <herbert@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 6:11 pm

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:49:30 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:


Well I wouldn't put it that way but sure, there is no clear correlation.

Except that such a high density of coding-style errors is an indication
that the code was not closely and critically reviewed by an experienced
kernel developer.


Sleeping inside spinlock?


If we're going to merge code which has zillions of trivially-detectable
coding-style errors and which hasn't been runtime tested with very
mainstream kernel debug options enabled and which afacit hasn't been
reviewed then we have no standards at all.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at..., Andrew Morton, (Tue Jul 15, 6:11 pm)