Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...>, Frans Pop <elendil@...>, <jeff@...>, <arjan@...>, <akpm@...>, <alan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
The 'zero impact' is what doesn't make sense here.
You are supposed to be able to run ol distributions, yes.
But that doesn't mean that you can necessarily just plop things in the
same way as you always did before.
For example, you have to rewrite your distro's initrd if you are using
modules. You cannot just re-use the modules in the distro initrd. So doing
a new kernel has _never_ been 'zero impact' in the sense that you could
just switch vmlinux files around.
(Btw, I personally actually want my kernel to be _truly_ zero impact, but
that also means that I don't use modules - because that way I really can
avoid changing even the initrd image too. But that also already works)
Why is it suddenly so important that a kernel be 'zero impact' for that
module case, when it's never been zero impact for that case before? You
had to rewrite the initrd to begin with, but now you're not willing to do
it again, just because you have to rewrite it slightly _differently_?
THAT is what I find so odd. The inability to accept just a slight change
in kernel build.
But whatever. This really isn't worth it. The request_firmware() thing
will clearly happen regardless, and as long as the backwards compat code
is small and Jeff writes it, what do I care? Even if I think it looks
largely pointless..
Linus
--
