Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mike Travis
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 2:26 pm

Ingo Molnar wrote:

...

Well it's very stable using gcc-4.2.4.  The earlier problems came about
using gcc-4.2.0 and has yet to be determined what exactly went wrong.
(And I need to install gcc-3.2 to complete the build/test QA.)

Btw, is there a list of "bad" gcc's for kernel building?  Or better yet,
can the Makefile script provide a warning when a known "bad" gcc is
being used to compile the kernel?  I seem to recall that Peter provided
this list:

	4.2.3 is fine; he was using 4.2.0 before, and as far as I know,
        4.2.0 and 4.2.1 are known broken for the kernel.

Thanks!
Mike
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jul 14, 7:34 am)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jul 14, 3:27 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jul 15, 8:46 am)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jul 15, 2:00 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Mike Travis, (Tue Jul 15, 2:26 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Jul 15, 2:46 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Jul 18, 3:17 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Mike Travis, (Fri Jul 18, 3:54 pm)
Re: [git pull] core/percpu for v2.6.27, Mike Travis, (Fri Jul 25, 8:18 am)