On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote:You know what - when nobody does embargoes, I'll consider your argument to have a point. In the meantime, I'm not in the least interested in your idiotic arguments. Especially as you can't even read what I wrote: Exactly. I don't embargo them. I refuse to have anything to even _do_ with organizations like vendor-sec that I think is a corrupt cluster-fuck of people who just want to cover their own ass. They're just normal bugs. But that also doesn't mean that I see any reason to make it obvious what to do to trigger them, and cause problems at universities and such. So I don't do "here's how to exploit it" commit logs, for example. (If you haven't been at a univerisity, you don't know how many smart young people want to "try it to see". And if you have been there, and don't think it's a problem when they do and wouldn't be happier if they didn't, you probably don't know what the word "empathy" means). Linus --
| Stephen Smalley | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Robin Holt | Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1 |
git: | |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Rob Coleman | S3 |
| Ian Kluft | 2nd CFV and VOTE ACK: comp.os.linux reorganization |
