Max K wrote:The following is just a wild idea. On systems using cpusets to setup scheduler domains (anything more elaborate than the default of a single, system-wide, domain) have a special purpose thread sit around, that does nothing except rebuild sched domains on demand. If this rebuild thread was the -only- way that sched domains were allowed to be rebuilt, and if this rebuild was done -asynchronously- sometime shortly after requested, without any error or status feedback, then it would seem to simplify the locking issues. I would guess that any system big enough to have a non-default, cpuset determined, sched domain configuration is big enough to not mind one more thread sitting around, doing nothing most of the time. If the above is a really stupid idea, have fun taking out your agression on it ;). -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214 --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Vu Pham | Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | [PATCH 0/11] ibm_newemac: Candidate patches for 2.6.25 |
