login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
July
»
15
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...>
To: <mpatocka@...>
Cc: <fujita.tomonori@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, <davem@...>, <linux-parisc@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE
Date: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 - 11:30 am
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:37:58 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
quoted text
> >>> This bug could happen on alpha, parisc, and sparc, which use VMERGE. > >> > >> Parisc doesn't use virtual merge accounting (there is variable for it but > >> it's always 0). > > > > Hmm, really? Looks like PARISC IOMMUs (ccio-dma.c and sba_iomm.c) set > > parisc_vmerge_boundary (CC'ed PARISC mailing list). > > That's right, I looked only at arch and include. > > >> On sparc64 it is broken anyway with or without your patch. > > > > Yeah, we need to modify SPARC64 IOMMU code (I'm not sure that it's > > worth). Right now, the best fix is setting BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY to 0. > > Even if we fix it now, the question is: how long it will stay fixed? Until > someone makes another change to struct device that restricts boundaries on > some wacky hardware.
I'm not sure how the boundary restriction of a device can break the VMERGE accounting. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_re...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Jul 15, 6:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 9:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Jul 15, 10:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Jul 15, 10:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 11:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Jul 15, 11:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 11:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Jul 15, 12:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 12:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Jul 15, 12:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 5:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 10:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Jul 15, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Tue Jul 15, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Jul 15, 8:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Wed Jul 16, 2:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Jul 17, 12:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Thu Jul 17, 7:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Jul 17, 9:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Sat Jul 19, 3:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Sat Jul 19, 9:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Sun Jul 20, 1:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Sat Jul 19, 10:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Sun Jul 20, 12:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun Jul 20, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Sun Jul 20, 1:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Sun Jul 20, 1:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Thu Jul 24, 11:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Thu Jul 24, 11:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Thu Jul 24, 12:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Thu Jul 24, 12:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Mikulas Patocka
, (Thu Jul 24, 5:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, John David Anglin
, (Thu Jul 24, 10:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Jul 24, 10:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Thu Jul 24, 5:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Thu Jul 24, 11:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, David Miller
, (Fri Jul 25, 1:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, Boaz Harrosh
, (Thu Jul 17, 9:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in bl...
, James Bottomley
, (Thu Jul 17, 9:56 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.21-rc6
holzheu
Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Eric Dumazet
Re: Multicast packet loss
jamal
Re: iproute2 action/policer question
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jens Låås
Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
494 guests
online.
Syndicate