Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, July 14, 2008 - 10:12 am

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:12:49 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:


If past experience is a guide, it's about to get harder because

a) maintainers jam untested crap^W^Wrecently-received features into
   their trees so they don't miss the merge window and

b) a storm of git rejects turn up as Linus's tree starts to get changed.

Hopefully b) will improve, as "all" the new code has already gone
through linux-next merging.

As for a), well, it would be nice if people were to be careful about
that sort of thing.  In some ways it's justifiable - we _do_ have a
couple months to fix remaining glitches.  But one would think that when
fast-tracking new features, the code would at least get additional
review and testing to make up for it.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for July 14, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Jul 14, 3:12 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Gabriel C, (Mon Jul 14, 4:43 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon Jul 14, 6:47 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Gabriel C, (Mon Jul 14, 7:18 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Andrew Morton, (Mon Jul 14, 10:12 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Jul 14, 4:35 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Mon Jul 14, 10:50 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Takashi Iwai, (Tue Jul 15, 5:20 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for July 14, Takashi Iwai, (Tue Jul 15, 5:23 pm)