Re: per-cpu related?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008 - 2:04 pm

* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:


please try latest tip/master - the self-test had to be removed. (gcc 
will treat the stackprotector-failure function as ((noreturn)) attribute 
and will optimize out the return path, making a reliable self-test 
impossible in the way we tried to)

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
per-cpu related?, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Jul 13, 1:16 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Jul 13, 2:26 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Vegard Nossum, (Sun Jul 13, 3:46 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Vegard Nossum, (Sun Jul 13, 4:55 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Jul 13, 11:34 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Jul 13, 11:55 am)
Re: per-cpu related?, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Jul 13, 2:01 pm)
Re: per-cpu related?, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Jul 13, 2:04 pm)
Re: per-cpu related?, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Jul 13, 3:20 pm)