Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.10] pm_qos_params: change spinlock to rwlock

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jakub W. Jozwicki
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2008 - 6:05 am

Sunday, 13 of July 2008 10:28:16 Andrew Morton napisał(a):
wrote:

[  114.647010] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context swapper(0) 
at kernel/rtmutex.c:742
[  114.647010] in_atomic():1 [00000001], irqs_disabled():0
[  114.647010] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25.10-rtXXX #10
[  114.647010]  [<c0120fc4>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0xf8
[  114.647010]  [<c045499c>] __rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x61
[  114.647010]  [<c04549e1>] rt_spin_lock+0x8/0xa
[  114.647010]  [<c013ec8d>] pm_qos_requirement+0x10/0x29
[  114.647010]  [<c038ef36>] menu_select+0x5d/0x7f
[  114.647010]  [<c038e4d8>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x47/0x9b
[  114.647010]  [<c038e491>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x9b
[  114.647010]  [<c01060ff>] cpu_idle+0xaf/0x106
[  114.647010]  [<c0441c87>] rest_init+0x67/0x69
[  114.647010]  =======================
[  115.649517] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context swapper(0) 
at kernel/rtmutex.c:742
[  115.649517] in_atomic():1 [00000001], irqs_disabled():0
[  115.649517] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25.10-rtXXX #10
[  115.649517]  [<c0120fc4>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0xf8
[  115.649517]  [<c045499c>] __rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x61
[  115.649517]  [<c04549e1>] rt_spin_lock+0x8/0xa
[  115.649517]  [<c013ec8d>] pm_qos_requirement+0x10/0x29
[  115.649517]  [<c038ef36>] menu_select+0x5d/0x7f
[  115.649517]  [<c038e4d8>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x47/0x9b
[  115.649517]  [<c038e491>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x9b
[  115.649517]  [<c01060ff>] cpu_idle+0xaf/0x106
[  115.649517]  [<c0441c87>] rest_init+0x67/0x69
[  115.649517]  =======================
[  116.650040] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context swapper(0) 
at kernel/rtmutex.c:742
[  116.650040] in_atomic():1 [00000001], irqs_disabled():0
[  116.650040] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.25.10-rtXXX #10
[  116.650040]  [<c0120fc4>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0xf8
[  116.650040]  [<c045499c>] __rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x61
[  116.650040]  [<c04549e1>] rt_spin_lock+0x8/0xa
[  116.650040]  [<c013ec8d>] pm_qos_requirement+0x10/0x29
[  116.650040]  [<c038ef36>] menu_select+0x5d/0x7f
[  116.650040]  [<c038e4d8>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x47/0x9b
[  116.650040]  [<c038e491>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x0/0x9b
[  116.650040]  [<c01060ff>] cpu_idle+0xaf/0x106
[  116.650040]  [<c0441c87>] rest_init+0x67/0x69
[  116.650040]  =======================

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2.6.25.10] pm_qos_params: change spinlock to rwlock, Jakub W. Jozwicki, (Sat Jul 12, 4:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.10] pm_qos_params: change spinlock to rwlock, Jakub W. Jozwicki, (Sun Jul 13, 6:05 am)