On Monday 30 June 2008 11:20:27 Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
quoted text
> On Friday 27 June 2008 18:41:37 Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de> writes:
> > > Avoid using queue_delayed_work in aio_kick_handler() to run itself
> > > immediately. Instead use aio_run_all_iocbs()
> >
> > Can you give some rationale for this change?  Also, how did you test it?
>
> The comment in aio_kick_handler(), "we're in a worker thread already, don't
> use queue_delayed_work" triggered me to do this. Ran multiple instances
> of Stephen Hemminger's aio cp for basic testing.
>
> I think this would make it unfair between different kioctx? May be only the
> comment should be removed?
>

Anyway we are scheduling it again with timeout of 0, so fairness shouldnt be a 
problem? If yes, wouldn't this change reduce the overhead of queuing the work 
again, and repeated lock/unlock.

Thanks
Nikanth Karthikesan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/