Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86_xx_percpu().

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008 - 4:29 pm

Christoph Lameter wrote:

I'm not aware of any paravirt-related percpu bugs (other than the fact 
that the last major revision of per-cpu variables was done under the 
aegis of paravirt-ops).

But booting on bare hardware with pvops enabled should be exactly the 
same as non-pvops with respect to percpu.

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86 ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Jun 9, 11:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Replace xxx_pda() operations with x86 ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jun 9, 4:29 pm)