On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:57:34PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
quoted text
> * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> [2008-06-09 16:54]:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:42:11PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > > Hi Vivek,
> > > 
> > > * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> [2008-06-09 16:29]:
> > > >
> > > > Can you please put some more explanation comment here to explain that
> > > > why it is ok to return with success, despite the fact that we never
> > > > reserved any memory.
> > > 
> > > Do you think that's ok?
> > > 
> > >     When booting the kdump kernel, the MP tables (for example,
> > >     or other firmware-reserved memory) of the BIOS are beyond
> > >     end_pfn. (kexec-tools adds exactmap parameters to the kernel
> > >     so that the E820 map is no longer used.) Therefore, it's ok
> > >     to return "success" here. For normal boot, the MP tables
> > >     must be reserved normally.
> > > 
> > 
> > Looks good. Thanks
> 
> Should I resend the whole patch series to Linus for inclusion?
> 

I am really not sure. :-). In the past, Andrew picked up the patches, kept
in his tree for couple of days and if something is important, he will push
it out to Linus.

Thanks
Vivek
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/