* Marin Mitov <mitov@issp.bas.bg> wrote:

quoted text
> > i think Thomas had a concern with the original fix - forgot the 
> > details.
> 
> Here they are:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/25/251
> 
> but see my comment to it.
> 
> There is no principal difference between both patches. I have seen 
> Steven's one as merged in linux-2.6.26-rc5. The only difference (if it 
> matters of all) is that in mine patch 
> preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() sections are shorter and protect 
> only the code that must be protected:
> 
> preempt_disable()
> rdtscl()
> smp_processor_id()
> preempt_enable()
> 
> As far as Steven's patch is already merged - let it be :-)

we could still merge your enhancements as well ontop of Steven's, if you 
would like to pursue it. If so then please send a patch against -rc5 or 
against -tip. Reducing the length of preempt-off sections is a fair 
goal.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/