login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
June
»
9
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
To: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@...>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <lee.schermerhorn@...>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008 - 9:38 am
Hi Kim-san,
quoted text
>> - Can completely optimise the thing away if !CONFIG_SWAP. > > I think we can optimize more and more in case of if !CONFIG_SWAP. > If system are !CONFIG_SWAP, we can never swap out anonymous pages. > > Don't we manage anonymous pages with list ? > > Such system don't need to insert anonymous pages into lru list when fault occur. > It is just needless overhead. > > Also, If we can't reclaim anonymous pages, don't we need anon rmap facility ? > I don't know well which subsystems used rmap. > > If pageout only use anonymous rmap for pageout, > we can remove anonymous rmapping code in case of !CONFIG_SWAP
You are right. but I think rmap isn't bottle neck in embedded system. Why do you want remove that? --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, Rik van Riel
, (Fri Jun 6, 4:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Jun 6, 9:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, MinChan Kim
, (Sun Jun 8, 10:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, KOSAKI Motohiro
, (Mon Jun 9, 9:38 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, MinChan Kim
, (Mon Jun 9, 10:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, Rik van Riel
, (Sun Jun 8, 10:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 04/25] free swap space on swap-in/activation
, Rik van Riel
, (Sat Jun 7, 3:56 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
David Chinner
Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
Andrew Morton
-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Trent Piepho
Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code
git
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
8 users
and
809 guests
online.
Online users
ukarimonies
netaict
pastliferegres
hotelyymod
filebankruptcy
selfhelpspirit
naturalskinctgn
thechpstyahihs
Syndicate