Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <jeff@...>
Cc: <jacliburn@...>, <w@...>, <pupilla@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <chrisw@...>
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008 - 10:26 pm

From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:07:47 -0400


Right, and if Jeff wants to work things that way for the
networking drivers that's fine.

Personally, I like to make sure some time passes between when
a fix goes into Linus's tree and when I push it into -stable
because time is often what shakes out the last remaining problems
introduced by some change no matter how seeming obvious the
patch is.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Marco Berizzi, (Sun Jun 8, 7:56 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 8:36 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, David Miller, (Sun Jun 8, 10:10 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Jay Cliburn, (Sun Jun 8, 11:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Jeff Garzik, (Sun Jun 8, 4:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, David Miller, (Sun Jun 8, 10:26 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 10:19 am)