From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:36:01 +0200It did not get lost at all, it's perfectly sitting in my networking -stable queue waiting for me to have an opportunity to submit it to the -stable folks after I do some testing. If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what is happening to that patch wrt. stable. I rarely forget to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already. Right now is an unusual situation where I am in a 3 week period of near constant travel, otherwise all of this stuff would have been submitted already. As I stated in another reply to you, that period is ending tomorrow so I should be able to crank out all of these patches to -stable some time this week. Thanks. --
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more dr... |
| Philipp Marek | Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
git: | |
| Krishna Kumar | [PATCH 9/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Implement batching |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
