Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <w@...>
Cc: <pupilla@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <chrisw@...>
Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008 - 10:10 am

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:36:01 +0200


It did not get lost at all, it's perfectly sitting in my
networking -stable queue waiting for me to have an
opportunity to submit it to the -stable folks after I do
some testing.

If you ask me in the future about the status of a -stable
patch from the networking, I'll let you know exactly what
is happening to that patch wrt. stable.  I rarely forget
to submit an appropriate patch, and when I do forget you
merely have to let me know (rather than submitting it
to -stable directly, please don't do that) so that I can
fit it in with what I plan to submit to -stable already.

Right now is an unusual situation where I am in a 3 week
period of near constant travel, otherwise all of this
stuff would have been submitted already.  As I stated in
another reply to you, that period is ending tomorrow so I
should be able to crank out all of these patches to -stable
some time this week.

Thanks.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Marco Berizzi, (Sun Jun 8, 7:56 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 8:36 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, David Miller, (Sun Jun 8, 10:10 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Jay Cliburn, (Sun Jun 8, 11:38 am)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Jeff Garzik, (Sun Jun 8, 4:07 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, David Miller, (Sun Jun 8, 10:26 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: [patch 00/50] 2.6.25.6 -stable review, Willy Tarreau, (Sun Jun 8, 10:19 am)